Below is a transcript of an article published by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) on their website on 16 December 2012 under the title of “Azerbaijan Armenia: Karabakh’s smouldering conflict” I was particularly concerned that this report presented a biased perspective which would mislead the casual reader who is not familiar with the detail of this conflict. My complaint, and their response is published below.
The reference to IDP (Internally Displaced Person) in their response makes an inherent political point. An IDP is someone who is displaced within a country; this is not the case here. People were moved from one country (NKR) to another (Azerbaijan) which makes them refugees.
I look forward to their report from Nagorno-Karabakh.
Azerbaijan Armenia: Karabakh’s smouldering conflict
Antiga Gahramanova has been waiting two decades for a resolution to the war which forced her from her home – but fears are growing that the so-called frozen conflict of Nagorno Karabakh could spring back to life, more ferociously than ever. A faded portrait hangs on the wall of the tiny room belonging to Mrs Gahramanova, who is now 80.It shows a beautiful young couple with dark mournful eyes: Mrs Gahramanova’s daughter and son-in-law.
Tears roll down her lined cheeks when she explains what happened to them during the war with Armenia two decades ago: “Armenian soldiers tied my son-in-law to a tree. “And they burnt him alive, screaming. Then they fired a bullet into the side of my daughter’s head.”
Mrs Gahramanova and her daughter’s four young children were forced to watch.”Then they shot my six-year-old granddaughter dead,” she said, wiping the tears away with her patterned headscarf.”And they shot another granddaughter in the heel. They said it was to teach us a lesson.”
She herself managed to escape. She hid under bushes for four days with the remaining three grandchildren before making her way through the snow, dragging the children with her. For 20 years now Mrs Gahramanova has been living in a small room in a crumbling Soviet-era sanatorium. It is here that she has brought up her three orphaned grandchildren. “The only thing that I want is to go back to my homeland, to die in the place where I was born. I just want to be able to go home,” she says.
An estimated 600,000 Azerbaijanis, or 7% of the country’s population, live similar existences in Soviet-era schools, hospitals or university buildings – families of five, six or seven people sharing one tiny room.
Often there is no bathroom – just a couple of foul squat toilets to be shared between hundreds of people.
In Armenia, meanwhile, around 10% of the population are refugees who fled from Azerbaijan, according to the Armenian political analyst, Alexander Iskandaryan. Horrific atrocities were allegedly committed by both sides. In the late 1980s and early 1990s hundreds of Armenians were killed in a series of brutal pogroms in Azeri towns. Armenians have accused Azeris of gang rapes, horrific violence, and attempted ethnic cleansing.
Today attitudes are becoming more entrenched: a whole generation has grown up being fed a one-sided, and sometimes even false, interpretation of history, without ever meeting people from the other side of the border.
“For my students, Azerbaijanis are like something from the moon,” says Mr Iskandaryan.”They know more about Britain than about Azerbaijan. And the same goes for young people in Azerbaijan.” It was a brutal war over disputed territory, which broke out in 1991 amid the collapse of the former Soviet Union. The region of Nagorno Karabakh was in Azerbaijan but it was populated predominantly by Armenians.
Up to 30,000 people were killed and a million forced to flee their homes before a tenuous ceasefire was agreed in 1994. Most of those who were displaced during the war have never been allowed back. Their homeland is now a war zone.The disputed region is controlled by Armenia but Azerbaijan wants it back.
Hundreds of kilometres of deep trenches zigzag along the front line in western Azerbaijan. It all looks like something out of World War I. At regular intervals there are raised parapets, protected by sandbags, with gaps to shoot through.
On the other side, just a few hundred metres away across no-mans-land and the battered remains of a vineyard, you can see a raised bank of earth, where Armenian snipers are stationed – presumably looking right back at us.
Both countries have signed a ceasefire but an official peace agreement has never been agreed. Peace talks meanwhile have stalled.
Soldiers say that shooting breaks out here on a daily basis, telling us that there was an exchange of fire at this position just a quarter of an hour before we arrived. Both sides blame the other, and say they only shoot in response.
What is clear is that over the past two years at least 60 people have been killed along the front line. Mostly soldiers, who on the Azeri side are often baby-faced conscripts in their teens or early twenties.
He may sound like he is ready for a fight but he looks nervous. Azeri villagers are also regularly fired on by snipers. They tend cattle and plough fields amid the remains of bombed-out villages within metres of the front.There are fears the situation could again spiral out of control and, with more sophisticated weaponry available to both sides, analysts say a return to war could have even worse consequences.
“There are now offensive missile systems capable of hitting Baku and Yerevan, the capitals of Azerbaijan and Armenia,” says Lawrence Sheets from the International Crisis Group.
“This is a conflict which has the danger of pulling in major regional powers.”
That would mean Nato-member Turkey on one side and Russia on the other. And with Iran next door, and the region a crucial source of oil and gas for Europe, all-out fighting would have serious implications.
COMPLAINT 21 December 2012
Your report on the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia was
presented from the perspective of the Azeris only. A basic investigation
would have recognised that the Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh legally
declared their right to secede from Azerbaijan under the principles of
Perestroika in the Gorbachev era, in 1988. It was the Azeris who attacked
the Armenians in Karabakh and laid siege to them from 1988-1994 – this is
well documented. The conflict arose because the Armenians were defending
themselves, and not attacking.
The aggressive approach to this legal declaration meant that the Azeris
living in Nagorno-Karabakh had no option but to leave – this would not have
been the case had the process of law been followed following the
declaration. Your report presented the impression that the people were the
victims of the Armenian attack. It is correct to say that those people are
victims – but they are victims of the Azeri government propaganda which the
BBC have succumbed to. You rightly report that Azerbaijan spends more on
military spending than the whole of the GDP of Armenia – did your reporter
not question why some of this may not have been spent on suitable housing
for these refugees who have lived there for 20 years?
The sniping across the line of conflict on a regular basis is not one-sided
– the evidence is that this is promoted by the Azeri side not the Armenian –
contrary to your report.
If you would like to report the Armenian perspective please let me know.
BBC RESPONSE 16th January 2013
Thank you for your email. We have considered your points carefully.
Our correspondent was unable, for logistical and financial reasons, to visit both Azerbaijan and either Armenia or Nagorno-Karabakh. He hopes to have the opportunity to visit Armenia or Nagorno-Karabakh soon. However, the article was never meant to weigh up the arguments on both sides or to apportion blame for the conflict. It was meant to be a story about one of the world’s most intractable IDP problems, and the risk of newly escalating tensions. To tell the human story of one IDP’s plight, it was necessary to recall her story. That story is, by its nature, one-sided – but we are confident a reader will understand that.
BBC News website