Cameron’s views on multiculturalism too subtle for the EDL

David Cameron’s speech at the Munich Security Conference last week was jumped upon by the EDL as somehow supporting their point of view, and celebrated the fact that the Prime Minister was now on-board. Typical of the EDL is their inability to have an intelligent debate much beyond the headline.

Cameron’s thesis starts with the discussion about the difference between Islam and Islamic extremism, and is quite clear in distinguishing between the two. For anyone operating on the right side of the law, or remotely interested in social cohesion, will be against any form of extremism – whether that by Islamic, Christian, or any other religion or ideology. The EDL feel that they were the founders of this position, and therefore any indication of a reference to this must mean that one is a supporter – fortunately, not.

The understanding of why extremism comes about in the UK is attributed to the fact that young Muslims cannot either identify with the staid traditions of their parents , or with the weakened British national idenity, which has, over the decades become a cocktail of separate communities with little to bind them together. They have not been led with a vision of society as a whole and have been drawn into the clutches of people who have filled that gap – being the preachers of hate, or other such characters.

When issues have arisen in the non-white community, we have, generally, been too cautious or fearful of dealing with it – unlike if issues have arisen in the white community, we have been very active. There has been a hands-off tolerance to differences, and on some occasions a fear of offence, which has then driven annoyance in the white community ( e.g. the anecdotal stories of not recognising Christmas in ethically diverse communities). All of this serves to promote separatism, and not integration which is the necessary bond of a modern nation.

He proposed two ways forward – one – instead of ignoring extremism, we should confront it head-on, and make it impossible for such organisations to thrive. That any acceptance of any marginal organisations would be dependent upon demonstrating shared ideals about democracy, liberalism, free-speech and respect for others.

The second way forward was to develop a shared national identity – not through passive tolerance, and neutrality about differences, but through “active muscular liberalism” which promotes a shared culture, languages and engagement with Britain as a nation state, and encourages an active participation in society. The aim would be to continue to celebrate the variety of cultures that exist within the nation but at the same time actively drive a common feeling of nationhood.

There has been much debate over the last week about multiculturalism, and multiracialism, and this tends to descend into a semantical battle which does not help understanding – merely allows “showboating” for the intellectuals. Cameron is not suggesting that Muslims cannot have a cultural identity within Britain, and would encourage the celebration of their religious festivals, alongside those of the other aspects of the community. He believes that our strength, will be in avoiding cultural and national disenfranchisement , by being positive about the value of a national identity.

Sound words and a laudable objective. The danger of course is that the soundbites are picked up by the likes of the EDL, and used to support their position, or completely obfuscated by intellectual commentators. Many non-Western countries do not tolerate the extent of cultural diversity that we do – this is part of our heritage since the Romans invaded 2000 years ago, followed by the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Vikings, Normans, Scots, Celts, Picts, plus the vibrant influx of people from throughout the Empire, latterly the Commonwealth and the European Union.

The EDL stand for intolerance and a utopian England that only becomes clear through a drunken haze of ignorance , and confused thinking. Cameron is making a bold statement about how we make some difficult choices and take action to ensure that the richness of our country does not implode through any form of uncontrolled extremism.

Advertisements


Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 replies

  1. the edl make a good and clear point of what the world has come to today, with hardly any violance i think more people should understand what the edl is about, mostly for are woman and childeren’s sakes the saftey of them is all that really matters. thank you.

  2. muslims do not assimilate into western society because islam is a theocracy and demands supremacy. there is no radical, moderate, hijacked or any other nuanced semanticism type of islam. there is only islam which is based on the life of a murdering 8th century warlord.

    the twin fogs of political correctness & ignorance must be dispersed before western society better understands this menace. even a brief review of islamic theology & history quickly exposes the deadly roots of this evil ideology.

    see the links in the pdf version below for more accurate info about islam
    ==========

    islam is a horrible ideology for human rights

    5 key things about islam

    1. mythical beliefs – all religions have these (faith) because its part of being a religion: having beliefs without proof until after the believer dies. the problem is people will believe almost anything.

    2. totalitarianism – islam has no seperation of church and state: sharia law governs all. there is no free will in islam: only submission to the will of allah as conveniently determined by the imams who spew vapors to feather their own nests. there are no moderate muslims: they all support sharia law.

    3. violence – islam leads the pack of all religions in violent tenets for their ideology & history: having eternal canonical imperatives for supremacy at all costs and calling for violence & intimidation as basic tools to achieve these goals.

    4. dishonesty – only islam has dishonesty as a fundamental tenet: this stems from allah speaking to mohamhead & abrogation in the koran which is used to explain how mo’s peaceful early life was superseded by his warlord role later.

    5. misogyny – present day islam is still rooted in 8th century social ethics: treating females as property of men good only for children, severely limiting their activities, dressing them in shower curtains and worse.

    conclusions ??

    there really are NO redeeming qualities for this muddled pile of propaganda.

    islam is just another fascist totalitarian ideology used by power hungry fanatics on yet another quest for worldwide domination and includes all the usual human rights abuses & suppression of freedoms.

    graphics version

    1 page pdf version – do file/download 6kb viewer doesn’t show fonts well, has better fonts header footer links, great for emailing printing etc
    http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B_UyNP-72AVKYWNiNTFlYTEtMTA1ZC00YjhiLTljMDUtMDhhNDE0NDMzNmYz

Trackbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Cameron’s views on multiculturalism too subtle for the EDL « Russell Pollard -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: